Wednesday, January 23, 2013
We have had 15 races, 4 on each two days, there are a lot of tired sailors.
The regatta has been dominated an won with a day to spare by NZ Peter Burling. He becomes the first international to win an AUS nationals regatta and the first Aust Open Champion. Scott Babbage has been second yet again but this time at least he becomes the Australian Champion as first Austalian.
The big crowd of volunteers from Wangi ASC have done a great job, the weather has been very good and the winds generous.
Next year we venture to Yepoon, with an AUS worlds in 2015 at a venue yet to be determined, Perth, Sorrento and Woollahra are bidding.
Thanks to ZHIK for the three big boxes of prizes, and to CST Composites who funded the excellent video coverage from Beau Outterdidge. There are other families involved at Wangi, you just do not know all their names.
The final results and the AGM are posted under National Documents:
There are lots of Photos courtesy of Kingsley Forbes Smith here: https://plus.google.com/photos/103272167201416950050/albums/5832143835306121313?banner=pwa
See all of the videos here:
Congratulations to Peter Burling (Aust Open Champion) and Scott Babbage (Aust National Champion)
Wednesday, February 8, 2012
. Last two posts were about rules changes? Still nothing finalised but I was on a committee of review and our decisions are being drafted into a rule proposal by Adam May for a vote sometime. Seems almost everyone else has forgotten and does not care any more.
. Just before my last post Sawdust and Soot died. The ultra light ply hull broke in two while sailing. I must have been too embarrassed to tell anyone.
. Dave Lister kindly leant me his original Manic for the Belmont worlds which I used with my foils and rig.
. Belmont regatta was a great success for IMCA Aus but not for me. I broke a lot of my stuff and none of Dave's for many alphabet results.
. After the regatta I got Karma back form Chris Dey, who almost got into the A fleet with it after minimal sailing beforehand.
. Only sailed it a few times before getting some angina pains, resulting in a heart stent and no more sailing that season. Resultant rehab has me now fitter than I have been for years.
. Over the winter I put a new working deck on Karma and lowered the wings and tramp down to normal levels. Built a new main foil from Bruce McLeod's new mold, simplified and stengthenned a lot of stuff and repainted the hull white.
. This season the boat proved much more reliable but the new foil seems to have a 20kt speed limit, as well as launching late. I'll fit a different foil before trying to sell it.
. Went to Nationals briefly with slow boat and poor settings for rough location.
. Bit the bullet and bought a Mach2 last week after deciding that I have had enough of making carbon dust. I figuring I have only a few more years of moth sailing left so might as well enjoy the sailing part of it even more. And looking at all the other Sydney fleet options I could not find anything else worth sailing.
. Aust will be bidding for a 2015 worlds at Geelong which is worth hanging in for even if I will be nearly 65 by then.
. So sorry for the few readers who like hearing about my latest experiments. Thats over, so you will probably not need to check with me again. I'll be just one of the multidue on one of those black boats going much faster than I used to be with any luck.
Sunday, December 26, 2010
How did we get in such a mess?
This week ISAF decided our current rules did not cover mesurement of wings so they could not be measured. Why?
Its only our current rules which do not cover wings because before that the rule read:
The boat shall carry only one sail. No extra sail shall be on board when racing.
The sails and spars shall be measured in accordance with ISAF "Measurement and Calculation of Sail Area". The ISAF Sail Measurement Instructions shall not apply. The measured and calculated area shall not exceed 8.00 m2, except that:
Clause 3.2.5(b) of the ISAF Measurement and Calculation of Sail Area shall not apply.
Only the area of that part of the spars that will not pass through a ring 90 mm internal diameter shall be included.
For a sail which encloses the mast, an area equivalent to the length of the luff multiplied by 50 mm shall be excluded.
For a sail which encloses the boom, an area equivalent to the length of the foot multiplied by 90 mm shall be excluded.
When we ammended our rules in 2005 to measure true area rather than the 3 offset simpsons rule method (Clause 3.2.5(a)), we deleted the above reference to the "ISAF Measurement and Calculation of sail area.. MCSA" which is what the CCats use to measure their wings and which Bora found still contains a reference to its applicability to the Moth class.
If we had retained that reference ISAF this year could not have made that decision. There are other matters of ambiguity, like how we apply luff length limits, mast length limits and the one sail rule, but we could have measured the area.
So in 2005 we inadvertantly banned something which the rules had specifically previously allowed. Its important that in 2011 we do not inadvertantly write new rules which prevent development in any new direction.
I am advocating strongly to reinstate the ISAF MCSA as our standard for area measurement. But we also need to decide a few more very basic things.
1. Do we want to ban all solid sails? Not just complex ones like Bora's.
2. Do we need the one sail rule or how do we apply it to multi panel wings.
3. How do we measure luff length of wings, or can we replace luff limits with a rig height limit.
My personal choice is to accept wing development as the class did pre 2005. They will get better, cheaper, simpler, more packable and faster.
I do not really care about the one sail rule, but if we delete it we have one less thing to argue about.
The simplest method of controlling aspect ratio is to limit total rig height to a distance above the keel of the hull. This is at present about 6.3m, which would be a good number to choose.
If we adopt the ISAF MCSA then we might as well get rid of the two other inconsistancies and measure total area of all exposed sails, wings and spars, ie delete the luff pocket allowance and the 90mm free mast area . We would have to increase the total to 8.3sqm to match existing rigs.
Please consider carefully we must not make mistakes this time which will cause dramas in the future.
Friday, December 24, 2010
The present vote is to decide if two specific wings will sail in the Belmont regatta. The default is they don't and 2/3 vote is needed to get them in. Its a tall order and the reasons behind it are obscure.
Apparently ISAF were asked some questions and they repied that under the current rules the wings are illegal.
What we do not know is what questions and documents IMCA gave to ISAF and on what basis ISAF made this decision. We do not know if the illegality is for all wings or for some particular design aspect of the two wings now at Belmont and waiting to race. We do not know if such aspects were modified these wings might be deemed legal. Its a bit of a mystery.
Back in July the IMCA executive had a debate and made an interpretation of the existing rules which seemed to cover most aspects of wing design. Unfortunately they then failed to offer this document to ISAF for endorsement and hence it became illegitimate. We do not know if ISAF were given the oportunity to endorse this document when asked other questions in December. It would seem to me that this would have been the simplest solution, ISAF endorsing the IMCA interpretation. But it became apparent that at leat one contentious rule was not addressed and also that some of the executive had been influenced by some anti wing lobyists. Its another mystery.
Whether the class should allow wings philosophically seems a no brainer. The class has spent over 75 years leading the sailing world in small boat development and as a consequence its always lead the small boat world in performance, in the foil era, in the narrow boat era, in the scow era, always ahead of everything else. Its not time to put on the brakes now.
The various arguements against wings are mostly self interest. Some of the fast Mach 2 sailors who think they might have a show of winning a worlds see Bora's wing as a serious threat. The manuafacturers of sails and spars see a business threat, the builders see changes in design which might make their boats obsolete or their tooling redundant.
The cost, durability and transport issues are things which will be overcome. Just because one well off American has spent more than most can afford on building and transporting wings does not mean everyone else needs to go the same way. There are other build methods other designs and its not compulsary anyway. There will certainly be times when a mast and sail are faster anyway.
The earlier questionaire also incluses some spurious questions, the concept of a tavel box restriction is nothing the vast majority of moth owners will ever need to wory about. This year about 30 people moved moths overseas to the Worlds regatta, similar numbers went to the USA, less to Dubai and to Europe. Its a minority activity by a dedicated few, not a universal class perogitive.
None of these things are in the class objectives or rules and should not influence any rules decisions.
We are sailing a development class and development should continue which improves performance.
We need to reinstate the IMCA rules reference to the ISAF sail area measurement manual which existed from the 1960s until omitted as part of some amendments in 2004. With some other agreed tidying up we will avoid another 6 months of angst and aprehension such as we have just experienced. Lets get it right in 2011.
Please all have a happy and peaceful Christmas, and I will see many of you at Belmont in 10 days time.
Friday, October 8, 2010
Next project is to modify the fin case on Karma to suit a Mach2 foil set for Chris Dey. He has borrowed my boat and purchased some M2 foils in preparation for a Belmont return to moth racing.
Time to build a wing?, probably not this year. Maybe next winter. Some discussion on a few blogs and M2 forum currently, seems to show weak support for a restriction on wings?
Have a look and post an opinion, not here.
Sunday, July 25, 2010
Due to some diversions, I have done very little on the moth for about a month, but as its only another month until some clubs start racing again, I now have to make a big effort to complete the project.
The photo does show some progress since my last post and there are a set of foils and two rigs in the shed as well, so I do have some hope of making the new season's openning races.
FWIW the hull and wing assembly as shown weighs in at 14kg, which I am very happy about.
Sunday, May 16, 2010
The attached image is my rendering of the new ultra light moth hull made from 40 year old organic carbon mostly produced in the secret forest regions of Australia's east coast. My appologies for the double image which also shows the secret design for an automated solar powered clothes drying facility. As is traditional this image is only a computer generated rendering as its much more popular than actually building something. More images will be released as construction progresses.
Using the high tech bathroom mass spectometer the established mass of the product shown in the rendering is 5kg including the CB case installed between imaging and weigh in, or 89kg including my bodyweight in support.
Design is based on previous moths from the Stevo House of Nautical Horrors and has been configured using organic ceribal TLAR analysis and software, and drafted using hand held compact synthetic carbon rods encapsulated in organic carbon composite tube onto reconstituted organic carbon fibre and celulose film.
Production will progress with an estimated output of one per millenium, so get your orders in quickly.